🔗 Share this article

Just two days prior to the NYC race for mayor, Michael Lange made a significant forecast – not just the winner citywide, but block by block. Lange, a political analyst who grew up in the city, devoted over a decade in left-leaning activism and emerged as a kind of local celebrity recently for his deep dives into city data and polling.

He published his highly detailed prediction map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate would win while missing Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his newsletter, his platform. He has a flair for witty coinages. He pointed out, for instance, the split between the “commie corridor”, running from one neighborhood to another area to a third locale, where he predicted (correctly) that Mamdani would triumph by huge margins, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. In those areas, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal surpass the mainstream paper” in audience and the majority of electors favored Cuomo, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Trends and Unexpected Results

How was your night?

I had to do that because they were adding around 200,000 votes into the system every few minutes! I was actually a little nervous initially: The candidate was ahead the early vote by 12 points, but came two big batches of ballots added later and the advantage went from 12% to 8%. It was concerning.

Understand, it was possible in which election day went kind of poorly for him, where Cuomo was going to end up basically doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. However the winner gained 500,000 votes to his primary coalition, and that’s a huge reason why he succeeded. He went out and massively expanded his base from the first round.

Expanding Support

Where did Mamdani get those extra votes from?

He assembled the coalition that progressives long aimed for: diverse racially, youthful, tenants and it’s people facing cost pressures. He improved considerably with Black and Hispanic voters, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the primary. Additionally he boosted his core of left-leaning activists, young leftists, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He built the coalition that progressives long aimed for: diverse, young, renters and people struggling with costs

Additionally, there were some Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a real thing, limited to working-class Latinos, Asian communities and Muslims. Voters in ethnic enclaves that went for the former president previously went for the progressive this year. However it’s not that he was winning over Caucasian laborers and Trump loyalists.

Turnout and Effects

One of the big stories of the night was the record participation. Who benefited?

Both sides. Turnout was significantly higher than anticipated. I figured we might go over two million, but it reached 2.3M – which is a huge number of participants. Existed a substantial opposition group, who were motivated, but his supporters was equally driven, and that was enough to secure victory.

You predicted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he likely for that?

Right now it appears he’s favored to surpass half. He has just over 50% but there’s still probably 200K ballots left to report as of Wednesday morning. Thus I don’t think certain, but I believe it’s likely, and I hope he does so afterwards no one can say the Republican was a spoiler.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His vote completely collapsed.

He lost any district in any area. Not even Tottenville in the borough, which is like an 88% Trump neighborhood. That truly surprised me. The independent kept very white areas, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and then added all of these conservatives on Staten Island with a high participation. I think occurred significant tactical voting by GOP voters. This happened prior to the former president tweeted his support for Cuomo, but it assisted. It could have even turned the tide unless Mamdani’s coalition failed to expand.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your much mentioned left-wing base – was support for Mamdani overwhelming in those parts of Brooklyn and Queens?

I think there was some weakening of the progressive zone in certain places like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, for example, the property owners and residents supported Cuomo. So there existed a little resistance. But overall, largely the leftist base is a key factor why Mamdani won – he scored between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the vote there was coverage on if Mamdani was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Is there any suggestion that he did?

Exist areas with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – like specific locales – where he performed strongly. But in the affluent districts like the Upper East Side, his Middle East stance was influential in those places. Likewise in the moderate communities including Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Bronx areas – they all leaned the independent. And also, there are Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union in the borough, who were strongly supportive. So I don’t know if there were crazy narrative-busters here, but he retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the another locale by big margins.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what New York represents in politics? Will progressive base serve as a springboard for leftwing candidates?

Absolutely, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest figures from progressives come from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I’m sure that there will be additional examples – candidates will come from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

But I believe that each urban center in America could develop their own commie corridor. Cities are the centers of progressive influence in America – since youth reside there, people rent and they are places where people are crushed by the inequalities exist.